dvdfab dvd copy for mac downloadcorel painter lite windows downloaddreamweaver 11 crack free downloaddreamweaver cs4 free download portable
Why did the director/producer use a young man with super short hair play Ra in Stargate Continuum? Have they not witnessed the original movie or did they provide the guy short hair additionally they could distance themselves from the first Stargate movie?
Goauld can adjust hosts, so it isn't much of a problem. Maybe Baal killed or gravely injured Ras previous host.
Whats stopping Ra from obtaining a haircut?
Nothing, but I wanted to ask about the outside of universe reason the genuine life reason why the director had for giving Ra a brief hair cut.
The guy they employed to play Ra in Continuum is similar actor who played Ra within the season 8 episode Mobius. Just like ONiell and Jackson have different actors for your TV series, the same is true Ra.
Yeah, but they might have just in the Ra actor a wig of long hair. My real question is why didnt they?
It may very well be that his or her didnt care as it just didnt Snake Plissken become MacGyver between movie and series, a character going from long hair to short hair inside the transition doesnt feel like a big problem. Besides, reportedly the people that made the series and also the people who made the movie didnt like 1 another very departing in the movie in this visually obvious way may have been their subtle middle finger.
Why does Dr. Jackson still need glasses after being inside the sarcophagus?
Its precisely the same reason Apophis began to age dramatically when he was captured by SG-1. The sarcophagus is significantly from an immortality box; go without them for more than a day and all of its miracles vanish with devastating effect.
Because he stopped deploying it. The effects you receive from having a sarcophagus while already healthy are simply just temporary.
Alternatively, his sight actually is fixed and the man continues using them just for looks. Not even at all times.
Does the sarcophagus fix defects that somebody was born with, or merely injuries/aging? If Daniel was developed with an eye defect the sarcophagus might possibly not have fixed it permanently.
I have just one single main thing which REALLY bugs Why does the main universe speak English?! Or rather, why should most from it? The first movie, along with the pilot in the series had the alien planets speaking his or her languages, a bastardization of an original language employed by the transplanted slaves in each But apart on the odd occasion the location where the alien race developed into not quite human or as different because unas - but not even for all those!, it looks like the writers just forgot with this limitation. Now I get which it was done to create the ease of storytelling better IRL, but why was no explanation given in-universe? Daniel doesnt even comment how handy it can be to have someone like himself who will speak similar to 8 languages come with the worlds where everyone natively speaks really the only language the whole team understands. My own canon is definitely that the SGC found the translator switch following the first few episodes and flipped it, so how the gate travel pops you the other side which can understand and become understood with the natives, however this doesnt explain after they get to a whole new planet by
This is definitely an artefact in the movie. If the series had launched by itself, minus the movie published by someone else preceding it, there could be no translators, and that we could assume some sort of Translator Microbes or Translation Convention what food was in place. Unfortunately, one in the main characters would be a linguist, so he previously to be there, nevertheless the issue of why was glossed over. Eventually, it became a running gag start to see the quote for Aliens Speaking English.
Every TV includes a built-in Universal Translator. That may very well be a smart-ass answer, but a Star Trek producer stated it years ago I use it anybody bring now up.
In-universe, the Starfleet communication badges are supposed to get built-in Universal Translators.
I think Word of God was how they gave up within the languages since it was just too time intensive and tiresome. Also, it truly doesnt add everything to the plots after youve seen Daniel take off another dead language concentrating on the same etymology for your tenth time.
There really needs for being some form of explanatory trope just for this. It falls beneath the Mantra, really, but so many people blow that off simply because think this means Dont question anything, ever! What it should mean, as well as perhaps what we need a brand new trope for, is the fact When adherence to accuracy would get inside way to become entertaining, in intended theme created with almost really the only intent to entertain, then it's both understandable and preferable that accuracy be asked to go have a smoke break.
It helps that 90% from the galaxys humans are former Goauld slaves. Its possible this is the case of Translation Convention and theyre actually speaking Goauld.
The books suggest the gates get some built in effect that translates things. Honestly which makes less sense than We didn't bring it up. does but it can be technically a clarification.
There became a throw away line to this effect in Avalon: Part 2.
They can build intergalactic starships, but why is it running around without a penny but Kevlar vests and P90s? We know they attempted to develop those plates that didnt work wonderfully, but they also have a minimum of one suit of Kull armor to reverse-engineer through the end of season 7. They probably have acquired a minumum of one of those Goauld personal shields, as well as being the Ancient ones in Atlantis, and also the Asgard doubtlessly have similar technology. After they got the Asgard Core in Unending, they can probably whip some super-armour in seconds. As for weapons, they did begin to use zats, and that we know employees weapons style of suck. The Kull wrist weapon seems to become pretty cool. They seem to own given up for the X-699, though. I guess projectile weapons will still be effective. Maybe miniaturize a railgun?
First: They arent just caught in kevlar vests. The SGC launched a series of light and flexible polymer plates which could stop a staff blast easily. They even demonstrate it in Heroes. They dont protect everywhere about the body but they also protect enough while allowing greater freedom of motion. Second: Just simply because they have some Kull warrior armor doesnt mean they understand how to generate more of the usb ports. It could have to have a unique ingredient that doesnt exist on Earth or even a manufacturing procedure that Earth science cant duplicate. Third: Goauld personal shields are part with the Goauld hand device, plus the hand device cant provide unless you are or were when a host to some Goauld. I cant speak with the Ancient shields on Atlantis because Im not hot for that show and dont watch it much.
The plates were shown for being just about useless inside same episode and subsequent episodes. Surely they might make something because of the knowledge from the Asgard. It would be too far gone for SG-1, but can have made the previous couple of seasons of Atlantis.
What will you mean useless? ONeills life was saved by one of the plates in this very episode.
But even that doesnt seem sensible, because modern constellations look nothing beats they did if your Stargate network was supposedly built.
Remember how the initial TV series pilot retconned the movie. Abydos was the nearest system to Earth, as well as other systems couldnt be reached for the reason that stars had moved enough which the Stargate coordinates don't worked. Only if they learned to compensate due to this drift could they arrive at other systems. In other words, the constellations change thing was taken into account in the very start.
Still, this doesnt answer the question of why the constellation symbols physically carved within the gates match the best way these constellations appear now, not how they looked millions of a long time ago.
Maybe it is not carved for the gates. Maybe its nanotech that changes shape when corralitive updates are finished. That would also explain why the POO around the gate was an original one once they used another gate and not why the previous earth symbol changed towards the at within the first place. head meet wall
In the main movie, the symbols were different on different planets. Of course, one hasn't got to think regarding the geometry long before realizing that the entire six points give three connecting lines that intersect on the destination system really doesnt sound right. Change only one point I think weve seen addresses that have been only one symbol apart, and suddenly you've got two intersecting lines and another that touches neither. I prefer to think that this addresses are in reality xyz coordinates with three two-digit base-38 numbers, helping to make much more sense.
But the Ancients use Base-8 math. Why would they will use a coordinate system in base-38? I know you said hello was fannon and I should bring it as such but I couldnt resist.
The base-8 math had been for ONeills benefit as they was attempting to contact the 4-fingers Asgard. The clocks on SG:Universe plus the displays on Atlantis utilize a base-10 system.
For what its worth, you can find symbols that arent on every gate. This may mean which the glyph utilized to represent a gate address component can be a localization.
In Stargate, the Earth and Abydos Stargates had different symbols. However, Stargate SG-1 retconned away this aspect, making symbols on all Milky Way Stargates identical except to the point of origin, that's unique for each Stargate. But then, the movie placed Abydos in the other side on the known
Since the Stargates are spread around all in the galaxy and beyond, in the other side in the known universe, would the marking constellations look distinctive from each different point?
A little clarification: on the other side with the known universe can be a phrase in the movie, speaking about Abydos, which can be wrong inside the series, where Abydos is one in the closest planets to Earth developing a Stargate, which is within the Milky Way galaxy. Apart from it, Stargates exist in Pegasus, Ida the Asgard home galaxy, probably inside the Ori galaxy wouldn't the Priors travel otherwise?, and whatever galaxy Stargate Universe develops in. But the Ancients had short time to plant Stargates throughout galaxies, along with the limitations from the address system they are able to have linked 38 galaxies, at most of the.
The one chevron difference is smart if you remember the intersection point could vary as it might not be between your two stars which are points. Bear with me at night a second. If you create a space, the room youre in at the moment. Use 4 symbols to create a point for the wall on your right. Now put a 5th symbol within the bottom left back corner on the room. Now assuming the stargate use some style of tolerance to snap to your destination gate and a couple gates close together. You could place that 6th point in room to obtain a very precise intersection.
More importantly, perhaps, how can you use 6 constellations to ascertain a point in space when constellations are sets of stars that only appear for being close to one another when viewed from Earth?
I think that is being over thought. Not taking into consideration all the retcon of the way the gate symbols plus the gates themselves worked, lets discuss it on the pure semantics in the symbols. If we assume how the gates are utilizing the 6 points in space to be a baseline for any possible destination, then why assume those points in space need to become so specific. It is not a whole lot looking for that specific points in space as it's a general representation on the area. An address as described within the movie and elaborated up with some retcon inside the series not specific points in space. Adding harry potter 7 and eventually 8th and 9th symbol gives an impact of origin, and distance or some such. It is all very imprecise after you analyze it, but that may be a little Fridge Brilliance in case you think with regard to how this tech might have been designed. I would assume a tech this elaborate on this simple associated with an interface function is expressly to be utilized by people that had been not as advanced since the Ancients that created it. Like giving a my first space travel device with a toddler. Yes, because analogy, we humanity include the toddler. So it most likely uses some massively advanced AI within the design so so it works regardless of whether in theory it shouldnt.
And let us accept it, the movie has never been meant to become anything more in addition to potentially a couple of more movies and after you make a sequence that is lasting 10 seasons plus two spin-offs there exists going to need being some serious retcon to hold things somewhat cohesive. They did the identical thing with Star Trek over time and now there is certainly a additional cohesive overall universe that does just about resemble what it really was inside beginning.
I still like my hypothesis that I typed up some place else that, instead in the simple to go into detail but impractical 6 points to make 3 lines of position to obtain a fix in space plus a place of origin system, the reason is actually the identity, azimuth and elevation from two pulsars plus the purpose of origin to be a procedural glyph. The point of origin symbol is different on each gate to show what planet youre on. To dial a distant galaxy, you add an 8th symbol just before the stage that origin as being a sort of area code, almost like to say this aspect between those two pulsars on this other galaxy. The Milky way system uses constellations as seen from Earth as letters in a alphanumeric alphabet because Earth is actually important to your Ancients history, nevertheless they dont mean the specific constellations themselves. Other galaxies use local constellations making sure that no two addresses may be alike.
Does a Stargate really transport you as the identical person, or can it kill you together with build a replacement elsewhere? The whole matter to energy and returning to matter conversion is one on the reasons Star Trek transporters are very controversial making use of their treatment of personal identity, yet this matter seems to become completely unaddressed in Stargate fandom.
It transports those through Hyperspace for the other gate transport isnt instantaneous: it takes one or two fractions of any seconds for you the matter completely to another stargate from the same galaxy.
That form of misses the actual. The question Im asking is, once you step via a Stargate, undergo molecular deconstruction and after that get reassembled at sleep issues, is the fact person on lack of still you, or merely a copy individuals, when you are irrevocably gone?
That can be an interesting question, but perhaps we need to go into about the Teleporters and Transporters page?
In the movie and early instances of SG-1, everyone was half-frozen and slingshotted beyond the Stargate. This implies transportation. Im not sure, but ahead of time they will often have even mentioned sensations over the transport.
IIRC, the storyline had no transporter feature - the gates made a stable wormhole that you simply walked through. Later on, however, they decided to produce it into some sort of teleporter system.
The whole Stargate is a sort of transporter thing has a few other problems. Weve been told that wormholes not specifically stargates are one-way for matter, but bidirectional for energy. But if a Stargate works, as it can be implied, by converting matter into energy, transmitting it, then reconstructing it for the other end, the reasons why for it only going a proven way break down. We can certainly, think of other reasons with this That its a property from the gate mechanism, not the wormhole, or that this bandwidth is asymmetric: if theres inadequate bandwidth for just a radio signal, you will get some static. With matter, you arrive without your kidneys nevertheless they dont jive while using on-screen explanations.
The bandwidth issue would actually explain it. Comparatively small upload is sufficient for anything wed treat as energy. The volume of energy in a very physical object is humongous in comparison with this, therefore, the wormhole cant send this sort of huge amount additional way.
Nemec could possibly be derived from Czech N mec meaning German, just without diacritics.
I kinda missed Jonas. Why didnt they create him a recurring character? It seems really strange that Jonas was aware from the immense threat the Goauld posed for the galaxy, but didnt ever help inside fight against them after leaving SG-1.
They mentioned his planet being conquered through the Ori fleet. Not Jonass planets, just Kelowna. No mention of I hope Jonas is okay.:
Nemec only experienced a one year contract while they all managed it he was let go for that more popular character/actor when Shanks went back. There was talk of keeping him, however they had a rule of 4 with a team. Which they forgot when Vala turned up For whatever reason he wasnt considered to become a reoccurring character like Janet.
To be fair, Michael Shanks didnt elect to just outright quit. It says inside DVD commentary he left because he'd a baby. I find that it is hard to believe he would be so focused on his job not to ever want to spend some time off to become with his newborn child. That being said, its fairly reasonable to feel that Corin Nemec may have had just a 1 year contract, then Michael Shanks would return to your show fulltime.
According to man himself Shanks left as he didnt like the writers were doing along with his character. He left seeking greener pastures finding none, made a comeback. The restore Daniel campaign helped too. He still wasnt happy using the writing for Daniel understanding that shows in the acting sometimes.
Did the Goauld influence Earth mythologies, causing gods for being named after them, or did they themselves adopt what they are called of already established Earth gods? And within the latter how can it make for good business?
Its strongly indicated that Earth mythology is cribbed off of the Goauld, not another way round. Daniels comments regarding how Ra and Apophis were living the book on the dead and how a rivalries match up help it become pretty clear the mythology in the relevant cultures is defined as a bastardised version of At Home using the System Lords. For some reason, however, they never say it unequivocally.
If thats the situation, so why do the!Egyptian Goauld use Graecophone nameforms? If they really were the Egyptian gods, Osiris could be Asar, Hathor can have called herself Het-Heru, and Apophis can have been Apep instead. And yet, they werent. Why?
They sometimes use alternate names. Notably, in The Curse Osiris asks Daniel where his her? brother Setesh Seth was.
Its because none on the characters know unequivocally. The only sources of information are distorted ancient myth, plus the Goauld, who had been bullsing such a long time they believe their unique press at this point.
Another problem: If ancient Earth mythology will be based upon for lack of an better term Goauld politics, how come there different mythologies for every single Earth culture? Weve seen more often than once that one particular Goauld can perform dominating entire planets probably several planets so just why is there a separate Goauld-based mythology for each individual Earth culture?
The RPG explains that as Earth was was obviously a valuable resource on the Goauld basically an origin of human slaves and breeding stocks because of their personal worlds, it turned out divided totally, and so, each on the major Earth cultures took its own pantheon of local gods. And theyre called what theyre called because those are conventional English names for your gods, so it is the result in the Translation Convention behind Aliens Speaking English at the office. For all we understand, the names with the System Lords may really sound completely completely different from both English and localized names.
Its worth noting that you will discover historical parallels here. For example, in Edo-period Japan one from the policies in the shogunate was the sankin k tai system. It required every daimyo to periodically move involving the capital city of Edo with the exceptional han domain, typically spending alternate years in each place. The whole purpose in the system ended up being to control the daimyos and them loyal to your shogun. The idea was that constant go and through the capital would put a monetary strain for the daimyos since they could have to spend ridiculous numbers of money maintaining two different lavish residences so that they wouldnt head over to war, in addition to encourage trade and economic activity through frequent travel. The shogun also required the wife and heir of each and every daimyo to remain inside capital year-round as hostages in the event that any in the daimyos got any funny ideas about independence. King Louis XIV of France also stood a similar policy. French nobility needed to spend six months from every year for the Palace at Versailles to aid the King within his duties of state and private functions parties, banquets, etc. We realize that Ra ruled on the System Lords for quite some time. Its possible he instituted the same system during that time using Earth since the capital of his empire.
Just to inflate on this, how come the many Goauld can speak English? I mena, call me daft individuals like, but I cant begin to see the Goa-uld passing for medieval European gentry and also that wouldnt be close enough, 19th-centry European gentry?.
Its probably a clear case of Translation Convention in the event the Goauld are among themselves or among their Jaffa/Lotars. Otherwise is merely pure, shameless Aliens Speaking English.
It could wonderfully be a variety of both. Remember that you can find lots of Goauld, several different human cultures, as well as the Goauld ruled Earth - areas of it, a minimum of - for millennia. Some Goauld could possibly have inspired myths while others can have appropriated existing ones. Its stated that some Goauld specifically inspired myths about ancient gods, but a comparatively young Goauld just setting up a place for himself within the world could have found it better to impersonate ones that local humans already advocated.
Why cant Stargates be viewed through? Light is a type of electromagnetic radiation, which could pass via a Stargate both in directions.
Where does the iris go? Into the Stargate?
Its three or more micrometers in front on the event horizon.
This isn't what I asked. Where will it fold into?
Probably somewhere behind the gate. Unless the gate just has unused space in the ring how the SGC decided to produce use of.
The took away from the gates faceplate added the machinery, then modified the faceplate to adjust to the machinery. Just like changing the faceplate using your laptop so it is capable of holding another cd tray except rather than replacing with a fresh plate they modified the previous one.
Speaking from the iris, with the best way it folds around itself with the center with the gate, there has to be a hole relating to the plates. I didnt hear any references for them using a metal that might be made as strong as being a solid block of steel yet as thin as to produce the hole inside center sufficiently small not permit a high-pressure jet of gate-traveller puree through.
The original iris was developed of Titanium outright said so in Children in the Gods which might suit this purpose perfectly as it can be stronger than steel at half the body weight. The second iris installed after the first was destroyed once they dialed in to a black hole is made of Trinium which can be hundreds of times stronger than even that. Although there wouldnt be any traveler puree because the iris prevents any matter sent over the stargate from reintegrating by any means.
This. They stated the iris was close enough to your event horizon that matter wouldn't even reintegrate. It didnt matter simply how much mass the not so good guys threw throughout the gate. Matter doesnt even reintegrate, precisely what ends up showing up in the iris is usually a subatomic particle stream. It creates heat as well as a burst of radiation you frequently see teams analyzing light, and from that they can can determine what style of matter they attemptedto send through. So the iris doesnt necessarily have being strong, it merely has to get heat and radiation resistant.
For that matter, how it happened to Sokars iris-melting weapon? Even if Apophis didnt use it when he was bound because of the Protected Planets Treaty during those times, why didnt Anubis make use of it right after his prefer to devastate Earth by blowing up its Stargate failed?
Did they ever state that Sokars weapon was something the Goauld could build? It might have been a one of any kind Ancient device; alternatively, Anubis mightn't have thought of computer. He pursued his goals, but was more attached to brute force than other things. He attemptedto destroy the SGC from remote once, if it failed he probably lost the battle on the easy incrementally stronger attacks one following your other motif and decided that the very next time hed just bring a fleet of motherships and conquer the entire planet. You have to admit the main you beat my 10th best weapon, so I will start to send my 9th best weapon against you thing is usually a bit stupid.
They did find a way to duplicate the end results of Sokars weapon on Earth when ONeill was trapped while on an alien planet if your local stargate was buried after an outburst which made him believe it turned out destroyed. It took them many months, plus it doesnt specify whether alien technology was implemented, however, if the people at SGC can make it happen, youd think so it wouldnt be challenging for Goauld to do exactly the same.
I assumed it absolutely was Sokars tech. The system lords dont generally share technology with one another. Unless anther system lord found the weaon no one else can have it.
Some Naquaddah is stable. There is also weapons-grade Naquaddah Naquadria is different to Jonas Quinns world which you'll make bombs from, and you will also make something such as a nuclear reactor from your stuff. That said, it isn't extremely volatile. They worn the extender, I assume, with the same reason you may make stuff strong by adding a certain amount of depleted uranium. Its an amazingly heavy superconductive element by incorporating unstable isotopes.
Naquadah is stated to become a super-heavy element. Its located in the still hypothetical in the genuine world island of stability thats speculated to happens to atomic numbers over known elements inside periodic table. If this sort of thing exists actually, it's probably radioactive, but inside the way that bismuth is. Bismuth-209 was long thought to become stable, but presumed being radioactive on theoretical grounds. It was finally proven mathematically to become radioactive, however it is half our life is 10 billion times the age with the universe. Naquadah is most likely exactly the same - technically radioactive, but decays so slowly that it is safe to deal with almost like it were stable. Naquadria around the other hand, is often a highly unstable radioactive isotope of naquadah probably with the extra neutron or two.
Naqadah magnifies conventional and nuclear explosions. As to the Stargates, thats a lttle bit that was grandfathered over on the Emmerich movie.
Didnt the nine-chevron planets have Naquadria cores?
Maybe Naquadah is similar to nitroglycerin. Its naturally unstable, more efficient when properly mixed, but they can also be mixed to make stable compounds including dynamite. And like nitroglycerin, its safe to own in your body in small quantities Carter and ONeill have naquadah of their blood because from the symbiotes.
Because the actual properties that produce Naquadah so devastatingly explosive when triggered can also be the properties which make a Stargate possible. Stargates function because theyre created from Naquadah; few other material is acceptable.
Ruled out by Orlins toaster stargate in Ascension. The Universe Stargates also appear to possess a much more machine-like structure, and therefore are very easily damaged.
IIRC the toastergate was specifically mentioned to simply work normally the one time before burning out.
How can your message Goauld even exist in his or her language, considering they simply call themselves gods?
I think Daniel said in the early episode that Goauld may be the Goauld word for God.
Goauld actually means children with the gods. So which enables no sense.
Not so. Gods will be the children of other gods. Just like children of men is sometimes employed to refer to every one of humanity.
Goaulds think theyre gods. Sense doesnt access it.
I always got the feeling how the name Goauld rolling around in its meaning as children from the gods referred for the species as being a whole, who inside their religious dogma were considered to be demigods, with just the System Lords being true gods. Consider the belief that no System Lord ever seems to trust that ordering Jaffa to kill lesser Goauld might damage the belief that this System Lords are immortal gods.
Another use could be de-Jaffafying Tealc, as it has been demonstrated which he would wish to possess that removed, and how the sarcophagus can restore the conventional immune system of an individual who may be made a Jaffa. I think both of such were shown before Need, in order that they couldve just yanked the symbiote beyond Tealc, stick him into your sarcophagus and after that blow it up. Um, after Tealc was from it, obviously.
Yes, its been demonstrated that this sarcophagus can restore someone who was created a Jaffa. Not someone who was developed a Jaffa.
Why didnt the SG teams loot staff weapons off dead Jaffa whilst them to be used? I know the main weapon of terror/weapon of war thing, but staff weapons have proven pretty deadly anyway, along with the idea of the energy weapon which has unlimited ammo, might be more destructive that bullets and may double being a melee weapon, not counting the belief that Tealc may have trained SGC personnel in the use, sounds really
Theyre inaccurate, unwieldy but not easy to conceal. Its a weapon primarily made for intimidation. Even Tealc stopped with it after a little while.
Staff weapons are obviously the symbol on the Jaffa, who many people would recognize because the footsoldiers from the Goauld. Several episodes have SG teams having difficulty convincing the locals that theyre not Goauld just given that they came from the Stargate, carrying staff weapons makes that even more complicated granted, SG-1 decides to generate that even tougher on themselves using an actual Jaffa carrying a Staff weapon with them the complete time. In addition to negating almost all the courses the soldiers in the SGC had up to this point with human weapons, Staff weapons just werent a lot more efficient than Earth-made guns.
And the SGC started using Zats before long, who have several in the qualities you mentioned. Plus at some part I recall them having energy conversions for their very own P90s.
That was for your Super Soldiers that couldnt be killed by normal means. But its still a good point. From the looks from it, it looks like redesigning employees weapons right into a more traditional gun shape would solve the majority of those
They do employ a cupboard brimming with staves and zats and stuff. Its that P90s really are, great. Remember the episode where they provide P90s for some Jaffa folks, and Carter offers a demonstration where she obliterates a wooden post with P90 fire?
If they've already that many of those why not just strap a few towards the F-302s only to give them a number of weapons that do not run out?
The Staff weapons were basically useless. The Zats however, were the uber-weapon. I dont get why they kept the P90s whatsoever. I dont remember any major character EVER missing an individual shot having a Zat, that they almost unlimited ammo, took down practically everything with a couple of blasts and can even be accustomed to just stun. They were comically overpowered.
Whose brilliant idea would it be to name all Earths ships after mythological figures? If you spend most of your time fighting people named after ancient gods and heroes, do you really name your ships after ancient gods and heroes? Itd be awfully embarrassing when they ever ran across a Goauld named Prometheus.
It is smart for these names for being associated together with the Tauri, at the least the first two. Prometheus was obviously a benefactor of humanity, punished by Zeus who was obviously a Goauld within the Stargate universe for stealing fire on the gods and creating to humans. Similarly, in Stargate, the ship Prometheus is created by humans from reverse-engineered technology stolen on the gods. In fact, that specific myth sounds so Stargatish that it is surprising it wasn't actually touched within the franchise.
Besides, the practice appears to possess been discontinued. The Odyssey is called after a legend, not really a specific person even though it relates to Odysseus. The Korolev was named following a Russian scientist. The Apollo would have been named following the space Apollo missions. The Sun Tzu was named after the Chinese gerneral. The Phoenix/Hammond really should be fairly obvious. So its really the Prometheus and Daedalus who have this problem.
Daedalus was a normal man who attemptedto fly with wings he built himself. Doesnt seem to be a problem in my experience.
Which is ridiculous, thinking about the amount of alien tech that are part of it. They should have swapped the names for your Prometheus and also the Daedalus.
The naming in the Apollo would nevertheless be quite problematic, since three members on the Greek Pantheon Kronos, Athene and Ares appeared as Goauld, and it also wouldnt are actually inconceivable they might encounter a Goauld with the identical name. But then again, the Apollo mainly operated in Pegasus, so it might have been very unlikely so it would have encountered its namesake.
Even if you will discover Goauld using the names of those ships, these myths inspired our enitre civilization. naming ships after them has become common practive for thousands of years and i doubt it could quickly change.
The problem is the United States already comes with an aircraft carrier along with a space shuttle named Enterprise.
That just offers them plausible deniability. Wait, what do you just say regarding the Enterprise? aircraft carrier, currently blahblahblah. But you mentioned space! re intending on going to view the shuttle. Yeah.
This might be more a problem together with the movie than SG-1, but why would be the seventh symbol in the Abydos gate reconstructed as such a problem? Daniel gets all worked up about this being worn off of the cartouche, but youd think all theyd have to accomplish is dial the gate repeatedly, trying a different seventh symbol each time. At most it will take thirty thrice assuming the purpose of origin cant be a similar as another symbol inside the address.
Similarly, the best way did Daniel discover the seventh symbol by considering a picture drawn by Skaara? There was nothing to link it towards the Stargate, he just draws a number of lines into it and claims that its the stage that origin.
The just try the many 7th symbols method can have been done inside the movie rather than needing Daniel to explain for them which to use. They have done the brute-forcing on Atlantis on Universe in order that they didnt stay dumb here.:
Whats wrong with Hathor? Granted its a fairly weak episode, but I cant visualize any particular continuity difficulties with it.
Goauld dont take dna on the host species to create them viable later we come across goauld jump from Unas to humans okay, Jaffa arent humans who will be altered by queens theyre genetically engineered because of this as was stated before Hathor, if your Goauld had this drug the main time, you will want to use the drug to only enslave every one of the planets you desire? I could continue but I think the idea is made.
It should be pointed out that although it seems to possess general errors, it wasn't actually disavowed from cannon. When the writers specifically reference the episode Hathor inside the season 8 episode Citizen Joe, to lampshade the errors concerning Jaffa and Goauld, one cannot claim they declared the episode non-cannon.
To add to here, the errors are minor in retrospect. Jaffa are genetically engineered Humans. The pouch just isn't born in to a Jaffa, but given to some Jaffa or anyone, really while using the Goauld device with the process. The only serious contradictions are definitely the DNA thing and just how Goauld Queens work. But once the episode generally is lampshaded away 7 seasons later, its tough to take the claim of writers managed to make it non-canon seriously.
Tealc needed to stop the implantation. Jaffa will always be born together. The Sodan cost nothing of Goauld control, however need them physically to live. The Goauld came up with the pouches inside the first Jaffa to be a way of controlling them, as the Jaffa literally could hardly survive without one. All of this really is pretty clearly spelled out over the series.
Okay therefore Jaffa are born with pouches, why did Tealc desire to stop the implantation of an symbiote as part of his son? Wouldnt his son die?
Yes. But Tealc didnt be aware that. Hes a soldier, not only a doctor. So its the good thing that mission failed or he would've had egg on his face.
But how could Tealc not are aware that? Tealc will not be a doctor but hes not an idiot. He knows which a symbiote acts as being a Jaffas body's defense mechanisms. He knows that your Jaffa will die and not using a symbiote. Why inside the world would he just believe that his son could well be okay with out a symbiote?
Because the Symbiote suppresses the hosts body's defense mechanisms. Everything that Tealc knows at now is a Jaffa that has a Symbiote cant live without, which a Goauld fundamentally alters its hosts body's defense mechanisms. From the above points it could well be a safe assumption which a Jaffa who had never been implanted might have a very regular human body's defence mechanism, how was he to realize that theyd been engineered with regards to immune systems to fail for a certain age?
Tealc planned to stop the implanting, because as far as they knew, up compared to that point, his son ended up being a fairly healthy boy with no the Goauld symbiote, and Tealc wanted it to stay like that. Unbeknownst in our favorite Jaffa, his son Ryac had dropped with scarlet fever and needed a symbiote badly, lest he die. Cue an Oh Crap! moment for Tealc.
In Continuum, it bugs me that Daniel along with the others continued making use of their insistence how they must Put Right What Once Went Wrong rather then go back to their particular timeline. They explicitly do not know how time travel works, so its in the same way likely that theyll be sent returning to something close enough to his or her world how they wont notice if you will discover any differences. Trying to convince the guy permit them change everything to what theyre familiar with would be more difficult than seeking to convince him to allow them go back home.
And just how do they get back to his or her timeline gets hotter doesnt exist anymore? When Baal changed things, he essential destroyed their universe and launched a brand new alternate one.
Judging by Daniels leg, once they stopped Baal from succeeding although he and that they already gone back in its history, it undid precisely what happened since he was executed inside the present. Supposedly executed. Which cannot make sense for the way they treated time travel in past episodes, and in some cases earlier from the movie. This tropers opinion? Psychic hallucination. Makes more sense than other things would.
Its completely in step with how time travel ended up treated before. When they stopped Baal, the brand new timeline made from that over wrote the previous one where he succeeded. Just like when he succeeded it over wrote usually the one where he never went back. Just like in Mobius when fiddling in ancient egypt overwrote their timeline with all the one without stargate, similar to in 2010 where sending a communication back caused that timeline being over written. Im not sure where your dilemma is.
There would have been a big difference with Continuums time travel they are able to see the results of Baals time travel happening. If someone changes earlier times, you dont notice people disappearing, the timeline just gets overwritten. The best Fanon explanation I can make is how they had exactly the same time frame to see and travel on his or her as when Baal had his original stargate travel for the past occurring, but would anyone everywhere from the galaxy employing a stargate are already saved in the changing timestream?
TV demonstrates use both Time Travel overwritting and multiple universe storylines are built to mess with your face. The two concepts of multiple universe and overwritting are mutually incompatable.
Ad SpeakIf your universe may be overwritten you will want to try this universe across the street TM and that is exactly the identical, except it wasnt overwritten./Ad Speak
Another issue with Continuum may be the sea Captain. Its implied and almost stated that they is our Cam Mitchell Carter calls him A walking grangfather Paradox! only aged a bit simply because had for you him to early anf the husband ended up setting up a Closed Time Loop. But if thats the situation, then why is this the captain is really passive if this comes to Baal appearing? He knows exactly what a threat Baal is and that they could appear with the gate. OK, so SG-1 favours the Many worlds version of your time travel in lieu of creating Stable Loops though they normally use a loop in Moebius, but shouldnt he make a greater show of stopping Baal the very first time?
Youre totally misunderstanding it. Its never stated nor implied implied that an original captain is our Cam Mitchell. Hes our Mitchells grandfather from commence to end.
Its quite a damn big coincidence that Cam comes with a identical grandfather who's roughly exactly the same age as Cam can be if he was sent returning to 1920ish that he was who his grandmother will not tell him about.
Actually, I think someones confused The photo inside the locker on the end had Cams grandfather as well as an older Cam Mitchell both from the picture. And when Baal or one in the whatever dialed in to the ships hold, Cam was within the hold likewise, waiting to the attack. He provided a crew member having a weapon to aid him fight. Also, one more guy was killed by Cams grandfather, who we saw in the event the gate shut down for the end with the battle. if memory serves. So, Cam was NOT their own grandfather.
Wheres it ever said his grandmother will not talk about him? The bit where Cam knows precisely what ship he was on? Or has his grandfathers photo within his locker? Yeah, Granny was keeping it a huge secret there.
This is often a fantastic demonstration of Willing Suspension of Disbelief. Thousands perhaps a huge selection of thousands of film and TV used the identical actor/actress like a sibling or forebear - its just something you've to accept when you are likely to enjoy the show. If you are looking for a clarification as to why such things happen look no further than Viewers Are Morons. Its the identical reason most stories involving bodyswaps dub within the opposite actors voice.
In the primary episode Children in the Gods we view Apophis a Jaffa step over the Stargate to Earth, capture ladies airman, then step back over the still open Stargate. Later from the series its mentioned many times that matter are only able to travel one way by using a wormhole. Explain.
I rewatched the ORIGINAL version from the episode not a final cut remake. After the Jaffa and Aphophis come throughout the gate and shoot the soldiers, you HEAR the gate shut down and also the water reflection around the walls disappears. You dont SEE them redial the gate, but it really is operating again when Hammond and company can be found in and see them departing. But it truly is very clear they had to redial the gate when you hear it de-activate.
The hottest theory is that this didnt go backwards, they redialed the gate. Its not only a continuous shot and also the Goauld are known to obtain stargate powering devices along with the knowledge/capability to manually dial, so it's just not impossible to imagine which they simple stepped through, went to grab those, shut the gate off, dialed back, then went back through.
Children from the Gods: The Final Cut addresses somewhat. Apophis orders his Jaffa to redial the gate although it's just not shown the way they did that, so when Hammond plus the other staff are rushing on the gate room, the dialing sounds are heard inside background.
How these were able to dial the gate with neither DHD nor access for the dialing computer is really a fair question all alone.
Cassandra did it having a device on the hand with the end in the episode 1969, so it really is technically possible.
This show appears to seriously underestimate the price of intar technology. They seem to get a near-perfect weapon. Non-lethal, no apparent long-term effects other than slight soreness, which enables it to take the kind of any weapon ergo, no special training needed. So why doesnt the SGC equip each one of-world teams with intars? It makes things much easier since, as ONeill himself stated, it'd allow SG teams to shoot first and have questions later without the need of consequences. No more Mexican Standoff scenarios. No more hesitation to fireside on primitive peoples who do not know any better. They can shoot, shoot, shoot, and sort things out later. And dont say it doesn't have enough intars for everyone. If they can spend intar rounds on cadet training simulations they clearly have the capacity to produce new intars. On a related note, why dont the Goauld use intars if they harvest hosts?
Goauld take Large Ham into a remarkable level, especially simply because dont need many hosts. Accidentally killing some dozen potential hosts is really a feature, not much of a bug; they really want as many on the survivors scared shitless as is possible. As on the use of intars by SG-1, they probably dont want to create a shoot first, seek advice later mindset. Theres an excessive amount risk of the usb ports encouraging native populations to use and kill you. Its also cloudy how effective intars are stored on armored opponents, and thus carrying intars would call for a doubled weapons load-out. The x-699 suggests the Tauri were working on more efficient energy weapons, but it is just not clear if such were successfully demonstrated.
For a little fridge logic that literally came if you ask me when I was looking from the fridge: So, if I got this right, the Antarctic gate was put there following one in Egypt was lost. Im not sure, its been quite some time since Ive seen that episode. In the future-wasnt-past time travel doesnt just be verb tenses confusing in Moebius, Ra takes the Egpyt gate with him, and also the people who got what it's all about have to get the Antarctic one. WHY could it have been there? I dont think it might have been necessary.