family tree maker for mac 2 download canadadelete softwaredistribution download folder server 2008financial accounting for dummies free downloadcs condition zero maps pack free download
Below is usually a snapshot on the Web page because it appeared on 12/21/2015. This could be the version with the page which was used for ranking your pursuit results. The page could have changed given it was last cached. To see what will often have changed minus the highlights, visit the current page.Recently a buddy and nurse, who I adore, shared a youtube video with me. Now I know my good friend to be considered a very diligent nurse and shes often discussed how frustrating it really is to come across Facebook pages and YouTube videos where nurses dangerously declare that people should never vaccinate their children.After reviewing thisvideo, I knew itmust have already been a major dissapointment to my mate, both personally, and professionally. While I wasnt completely surprised at the comments this specific Patriot Nurse made, I ama bit concerned with the information she presents. /riM4xfrzjAY
At a symptom, the Patriot Nurse states that please note are deterred, but explains it is because she is only thinking about intelligent debate. As far as Im concerned, debate only comes about when both sides arrive at present their position. So, after viewing film I figured we could certainly help facilitate debate for your Patriot Nurse.
Interestingly enough, its unclear whether this video is tied by any means to Rachel Greene on the Patriot Nurse blog.Could this function as same Rachel Greene who works like a nurse in a very TN birthing center?I certainly hope not. As far as the informed consent she demands in her video, I would must wonder when the parents pregnancy in that center are fully informed abouther thoughts about vaccines.
To start the discussion, I wanted firstly comments I received from another nurse withserious objections about what the Patriot Nurse states in film above.As a Canadian nurse, having an additional background in biology, who works for a large teaching hospital, shell explain to you dont take her word for anything, but, steer clear of individuals who use You Tube to spout off misinformation and attempt to convince happened to protect your sons or daughters from preventable disease.
Of course, as usual, we welcome your comments in the intelligent debate below.
1 The Patriot Nurse discusses the additives seen in vaccines.
As everybody knows there is no mercury in vaccines there is never mercury in vaccines. There WAS thimerosal, which is really a mercury compound. Table salt is usually a chlorine compound. Basic chemistry teaches us which simply because something features a compound inside that might be dangerous naturally doesn t imply it s dangerous in all cases. H2o is usually not dangerous, but detract that o, also it becomes combustible.
She givesan demonstration of a tuna sandwich. She mayclaim that as the gut is often a semi-permeable membrane that eating fish with mercury can be different than injecting mercury.
a As discussed, there's no mercury in vaccines. And the 2 types of mercury you re discussing usually are not molecularly similar.
Which shows that ingestion of mercury will not be a protective mechanism.
Aluminum is considered the most abundant aspect in our environment. We ingest sizable numbers of it on a regular basis. Aluminum might be more plentiful in breast milk than vaccines; a newborn will ingest more aluminum from breastfeeding than all of the childhood vaccines created.
During the 1st 6 months of life, infants could receive about 4 milligrams of aluminum from vaccines. Thats not greatly: a milligram is one-thousandth of an gram along with a gram may be the weight of one-fifth of any teaspoon of water. During exactly the same period, babies will even receive about 10 milligrams of aluminum in breast milk, about 40 milligrams in infant formula, or about 120 milligrams in soy-based formula.
Aluminum no matter route of entry is excreted very efficiently because of the kidneys.
Most in the aluminum that enters your body is eliminated quickly. Though all on the aluminum contained in vaccines enters
the bloodstream, below 1 percent of aluminum within food is absorbed over the intestines into your blood. Either way, most in the aluminum from the bloodstream is immediately bound by the protein called transferrin, which carries aluminum towards the kidneys where it's eliminated from our bodies. About fifty percent of aluminum in vaccines or in meals is eliminated in lower than 24 hours; eighty-five percent is eliminated into two weeks and 96 percent is eliminated in several years. The ability in the body to rapidly eliminate aluminum is the reason for its excellent record of safety.
2 The Patriot Nurse states that vaccines bypass the gut, that's our natural defense mechanism.
Many pathogens bypass the gut, so I don t discover how this is relevant. I assume shes attempting to make some point that vaccines bypass the mucous membranes. And? We vaccinate contrary to the diseases we all do, partly, BECAUSE we have been susceptible to them since they EASILY bypass our innate defenses. Mucous membranes cannot kill a pathogen.
As everybody knows, the top concern was thimersol causing autism. After the removing thimersol from vaccines, the interest rate of autism went UP and that is not whatever we would be ready to see if thimersol would have been a causative factor. There are actually so many studies showing zero correlation between vaccination and autism that I m amazed each time I even see this described.
Has she seen the scientific research showing a DROP in autism amongst vaccinated versus unvaccinated children?
So, either shes mistaken about vaccines and autism, or she believes there can be a worldwide conspiracy of biomed experts who want to poison our youngsters.
4 The Patriot Nurse covers the vaccine schedule.
Of what? The defense mechanisms that encounters loads of pathogens each day?
6 The Patriot Nurse procedes discuss allergies and autoimmune disorders, praoclaiming that she couldn t find out anything OTHER than vaccines that may have caused a spike in said conditions.
I must point out that because SHE can t consider something doesn t necessitate that there ISN T something. I am a nurse by having an additional degree in biology. I respect and love nursing. But we usually are not scientists. We aren't immunologists. And we shouldn t be speaking authoritatively around the causative factors of allergies or autoimmune disorders that s not inside our scope.
7 The Patriot Nurse discusses breast milk being one and only thing necessary to guard a neonate.
Breast milk can just provide antibodies with a child for things which the mother is protected from. If mom has never HAD MENINGITIS she doesn't need antibodies to feed on that could protect her baby from meningitis. Additionally, it is well known that anti-bodies in breast milk taper greatly on the 6 month mark.
Vaccines feel secure and effective. Scientific study has revealed this actually, beyond a shadow of the doubt. No vaccine or any medicine is without risks, and I would encourage people to communicate with their physician should they be having doubts or questions. Remember that now you may post anything they wish for the internet whether it be true or you cannot. And simply because something SOUNDS authoritative doesn't make it correct.
The analysis in this video with the Canadian nurse is wonderful to use depth. I applaud her for making it every one of the way through this video along with showing that nurses can actually be intelligent and responsible.
This woman need to be ashamed of herself. People look for nurses as reliable caretakers lives are in their hands. If she really does work at that birthing center linked with above, I hope they take this seriously.
I hope her employer will not condone her nonsense.
While often it may seem quicker to ignore youtube posters and Facebook pages that post misinformation, ignoring these reasons for propaganda poses a credible threat to communities. A nurses job should be to educate and advocate with the patient. When a registered nurse ignores the substantial medical studies the forest of scientific validity of immunizations, and will want to rely on personal blogs and anti-science websites in promoting incorrect views, the general public health is put at risk.
I am very glad that this real nurse took her time and energy to debunk a variety of myths and misconceptions of science. Learning and education doesn t result in nursing school. Nurses must continuously update their knowledge and bedside skills using credible options for information. In regards to immunizations, I advise that nurses look into The American Nurse Association- to hold fresh with current vaccine data.
I do hope that any patient with the the Patriot Nurse was remedified and educated inside true pro/cons of vaccinations plus the very real threat of vaccine-preventable dieases.
The American Nursing Association can be a federally funded organization from the Dept of Health. Some people would argue the Dept of health their very own own motives for encouraging vaccine uptake we won t end up in this as exactly the basics is plenty for you to consume. I would not consider this as a credible types of information why don t you really look at scientific tests that were peer reviewed, published and NOT paid for by the pharma company or anyone connected to some gov t body? You could be more likely then to possess a non-biased source.
January 17, 2012 at 10:34 pm
Indeed. Their motives will improve the health of Americans. Part on this involves preventing disease.
Oh, perhaps you were talking about global depopulation something like that. You re right; let s stick to your basics.
Of course not. They support vaccination. Therefore for you, they aren't a credible method of obtaining information.
why dont you will look at research that were peer reviewed, published and NOT paid for by way of a pharma company or anyone connected to some govt body?
I have. I ve viewed hundreds of studies all sorts of sources, many not connected to your government body. I ve also considered independent reviews in the literature. It overwhelmingly supports vaccines as being a safe and effective measure to avoid disease and save lives.
Of course, it s only in Antivaxxerland that having anyone connected with a gov t body means which the research actually means the contrary.
January 18, 2012 at 12:00 am
why don t you provide some credible links to prospects who don t know the best places to turn?
January 18, 2012 at 12:26 am
It includes techniques to top vaccine questions as well as looks at each vaccine individually, like the diseases each prevents. What other information are you wanting? Would you like to see studies?
Vaccination isn't immunization. Vaccination is really a form of delusional insanity the brainwashed population unfortunately subscribes to. The word vaccination is derived in the Latin word for cow vaca, because Edward Jenner who started this nonsense in 1796 used the lymph from your cowpox blister about the hand of the dairymaid to inoculate people against smallpox. Initially this nonsense was opposed because of the medical profession, but once the commercial potential with this superstition was realised it stumbled on support it, although some people including many medical professionals opposed this fraud. To vaccinate literally method for cowify, because barbaric practice introduced bovine DNA in the human organism, with dire consequences. This insane practice also promoted a herd mentality insurance firms people believe this evil intervention could prevent smallpox. It didn t, but rather promoted mental and physical degeneration, in the same way modern vaccines carry on doing today.
Citation, please, kindly. Thanks.
I introduce bovine DNA regularly into my human organism. For instance, today, I stood a hamburger for lunch.
Erwin Alber vaccineshur doesn t provide citations. He trots out things such as delusional insanity everywhere, whilst inferring that vaccines cause you to gay. Trolololol
January 26, 2012 at 12:20 pm
It is often a threat to the health when doctors and nurses don t carry on to date on science appearing inside peer reviewed literature and just accept the CDC, FDA, AMA and AAP distill down for the kids. Those organizations are exceedingly biased toward interventions promoted because of the pharmaceutical companies, who fund and conduct virtually all in the research asserting safety. The entire issue on this months medical journal LUPUS is about autoimmune issues a result of aluminum adjuvants, specifically those in pediatric populations. There is considerable scientific evidence that vaccine ingredients, preparations, combinations and schedules are causing neurological and body's defense mechanisms dysfunction but this evidence is essentially hidden from your general public, ignored through the media, and unread by experts. The major flaw inside analysis above, is the fact that government vaccine safety studies are conducted using active placebos and active controls, and studies don't follow patients with the duration how the vaccine is biologically active and reactive within the body, they will not study the biological and genetic changes that happen after vaccination, they don't compare health link between fully vaccinated children to health eating habits study unvaccinated children, and they tend not to study effectiveness, that is different from efficacy. Until these studies are done, it can be IMPOSSIBLE to express that vaccines are actually proven safe.
January 26, 2012 at 12:27 pm
Citation needed for everything.
they tend not to compare health link between fully vaccinated children to health eating habits study unvaccinated children,
Please describe just how that could well be done and conform to the Belmont Report.
First, vaccines must be studied in a very primate model. Newborn primates ought to be vaccinated with all of recommended vaccines for the same age and weight adjusted schedule and before each vaccine, blood, urine and stool taken and analyzed for modifications to biomarkers and genes. Primates must be evaluated for cognitive, motor and social/emotional behaviors. Inflammatory markers, immune markers along with markers for common chronic diseases which are currently epidemic from the last 30 years really should be analyzed. The animals ought to be sacrificed with a 5 7 year interval in addition to their brains and CNS needs to be examined for changes. Their intestines must be examined for changes, along with skin, nerves, lungs, as well as other major organ systems. These results ought to be compared to controls that receive inert placebos. The study needs to be blinded and conducted by independent investigators without any government or industry affiliations. If the vaccines will not pass these tests, then they ought not be administered to newborns and infants.
More research on carcinogenicity, fertility, age related neurological disease in addition to effectiveness-do the vaccines actually steer clear of the diseases they may be designed in order to avoid?
Wow. And you have an honest monkey model for everyone this human pathology, can you? And how many hundreds and hundreds of monkeys does one think must be sacrificed of these studies to possess sufficient chance to reliably detect problems? And that you are okay with letting people die on the vaccine preventable diseases while these long-term primate studies are underway?
do the vaccines actually stay away from the diseases they may be designed in order to avoid?
Yes. There is a lot of research on that BTW.
If other interventions that happen to be less toxic and fewer harmful and much less manipulative from the immune system work nicely at preventing disease for instance handwashing, good nutrition, sanitation, improved sterilization of dental tools that has been scientifically linked with spreading AIDS as well as other blood and saliva transmissible infectious diseases, should we constantly berate people that question the adequacy and validity of science that NVAC, WHO and IOM all state is inadequate to detect questions of safety?
Can everybody eat peanuts? Can everyone take Tylenol? Will anyone react exactly the same to vaccines? We will not be one-size-fits everybody and some will react worse than the others. It is immoral to state that some must be sacrificed for that benefit of others. How do we decide who definitely are sacrificed? The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System is flawed not as it overcounts reactions, but as it undercounts them around 90%. Furthermore, no systematic protocol for evaluating vaccine injuries has been established besides denial.
Vaccines were invented before we even the most rudimentry and rudimentary strategies to identifying viruses or analyzing the affect the body's defense mechanisms. There is much perform not know. Scientific principles which are accepted as fact hundred years ago are laughed at today. Science just isn't static it evolves with new discoveries. Creating a climate where science can not be questioned hampers our progress. One fact remains that's even though diseases had substantially declined ahead of the vaccines to help remedy them became available, since vaccines are already given in increasing numbers, increasingly more children are chronically ill and disabled. We also have approximately 500, 000 and 2million autistic children that wouldn't exist thirty years ago. This can be a far greater problem than all with the infectious diseases we vaccinate for combined and now we need to get real about determining a way to identify and solve this concern before it destroys our country. Academic Pediatrics recently released a survey reporting that 54% of children possess a chronic health.
So what? That is only 1 factor. Why are you ignoring morbidity? What about the folks who got the diseases and suffered permanent disability? What in regards to the costs with the hospital care to help keep people from dying from diphtheria, pertussis and measles?
Go to my comment at January 18, 2012 at 1:53 am 156, and answer my question on the caused the morbidity rate of measles to lower 90% between 1960 and 1970 within the USA.
What you want to do now is explain just how the DTaP and Tdap vaccines are definitely more dangerous than diphtheria and pertussis. And how the MMR vaccine is a lot more dangerous than measles. I posted to evaluate papers for the effects from the diseases, then one specifically on measles The Clinical Significance of Measles: A Review. Please post the title, journal, and dates in the PubMed indexed papers to back up your answers. Show the comparative risks.
Here is a other data that you should use you can certainly find the full papers on PubMed, I expect exactly the same level of evidence by you:
Emerg Infect Dis. 1998 Oct-Dec;44:539-50.
Diphtheria inside former Soviet Union: reemergence of your pandemic disease.
J Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;181 Suppl 1:S10-22.
Successful control over epidemic diphtheria from the states with the Former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: lessons learned.
Lancet. 1998 Jan 31;3519099:356-61.
Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story.
JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;29818:2155-63.
Historical comparisons of morbidity and mortality for vaccine-preventable diseases inside United States.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Mar;1603:302-9. Review.
Impact of specific medical interventions on decreasing the prevalence of mental retardation.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:1136-1144.
Economic Evaluation from the 7-Vaccine Routine Childhood Immunization Schedule from the United States, 2001
J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1;189 Suppl 1:S131-45.
An economic analysis in the current universal 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella vaccination program from the United States.
Pediatric hospital admissions for measles. Lessons in the 1990 epidemic.
Measles epidemic from failure to immunize.
Terrifying a health care professional responsible for that care of patients, some in critical health, can spout a lot false details about medicine and science. Canadian Nurse did a superb job. Thank you to all of the nurses that practice evidence based medicine and adhere to the science, not what's trendy
The only evidence I have seen on vaccines is negative Erika. Try reading some non-biased peer reviewed published studies. There are many that you read when you REALLY are serious about evidence based medicine. I think a lot of people tend to forget which simply because something was done in the study won't mean that it was reliable, You need to take into account that data may be manipulated in a manner as to give you a false impression. If you have a look at these studies close enough it is possible to decide for yourself the ones have. Any study performed with a pharma company or someone that is paid by them etc is unreliable obviously.
Thanks, but ill adhere to the advice in our 3 pediatricians, 2 specialists, multiple nurses, and heart surgeon, who know my child s body muh superior to you or any youtube nurse.
January 17, 2012 at 10:36 pm
You need to take into consideration that data is usually manipulated in a way as to give you a false impression.
So will you. The thing is always that there is much more data that supports vaccines, that to claim it really is all manipulated ventures into wacky conspiracy territory.
So why no links or citations to compliment this claim?
Thank GOD someone out there exists for health choices!! No one else may seem to care about might then when you're injured using a vaccine, NO ONE is held accountable.
Amy, you would possibly know and Marsh certainly is aware that if a vaccine causes damage, then there can be a system whereby claims could be settled reasonably easily with the NCVI court, using a no fault basis for making claims quicker to succeed and avert the requirement for expensive litigation that might cost plaintiffs huge degrees of money, but that failing this there's still an opportunity available to sue the maker.
Who is held accountable whenever a child dies at a vaccine preventable disease? The chances of which, BTW, is many orders of magnitude higher than coming from a vaccine.
For somebody that claims to deliver No-nonsense sic, straight talk, she may seem to talk a awful great deal of nonsense straight from her
Antibodies in breastmilk undoubtedly are a myth. There are no disease specific antibodies in breastmilk beyond 2 weeks post partum. The bulk of maternal immunity is transplacental breastfeeding protects against upper respiratory and gastrointestinal bugs like polio, hib, pneumococcus, although not against measles, pertussis and Co.
And Amy the one reason misinformed, self appointed, anti-vaccine activists like this patriotic nurse can advocate choices vaccine refusal is the fact non-vaccinators cost nothing riding about the herd immunity generated by sensible individuals who vaccinate along with the awesome nurses who vaccinate them!.
IF you are correct with your theory about only reason misinformed, self appointed, anti-vaccine activists prefer that patriotic nurse can advocate choices vaccine refusal you then who choose to consider vaccines don't have anything to worry about right? If the vaccines work, you might be protected. So allow us to generate our choices in peace. We don t complain when our unvaccinated kids catch things from your vaccinated ones!
The challenge with this argument is the fact that there are people who are not vaccinated young babies by way of example who count on herd immunity likewise much as you choose to do. The difference between you together with them is the fact that they have zero choice. And, God forbid, should you or a an affiliate your unvaccinated family were to contract a vaccine-preventable illness and pass it on to someone struggling to be vaccinated, you can be morally culpable whenever they were to die or suffer irreperable harm. Your choice puts people who have no choice in jeopardy.
Sarah, if I stood a dollar for whenever this myth you promulgate is comprehensively refuted as neatly made by Heather yet ignored, I can be a very wealthy man.
Sorry but that you are sadly mis-informed. Patriot nurse has VERY valid points and it is usually a real shame that folks just exuse these points simply as scare mongering etc. I have TWO children who suffered uncomfortable side effects from vaccines and today realise after several years of research that vaccine injury happens A LOT and once you look even closer, many/most are ineffective! If you truly are thinking about this debate I would suggest simply reading the DOCTORS prescribing information leaflet that accompany a vaccine the sufferer info is insufficient. Research the ingredients especially adjuvants- to see how that it was harvested if applicable. Also take a look at who/what groups it offers and has not been tested on. Suprisingly many vaccines they push on for instance pregnant women have not been tested on them/that group. Look at just what are toxic numbers of ingredients mentioned- be sure you remember when reading these vaccines can also be NOT tested mixed with or for their combined effects even though they can be regularly succumbed combination. etc. I vaccinated the children. I thought I was to be a good mother, I thought I was protecting them, I thought I was doing the right thing by simply believing what my doctor informed me rather than researching myself. If I knew then what I do now, I would never had let my kids be vaccinated. natural immunity is FAR superior. Now my students are damaged/injured because I didn t know. Don t just brush off what others ought to say. Try to listen. Stop thinking being a herd. Thanks.
What toxic amounts? You do realize that dose is vital, don t you? For example as Canadian Nurse noted, there s considerably more Al in breast milk than inside entire vaccine schedule.
How is it that she actually is even a nurse within the first place if the girl with spouting these lies! That s horrible to NOT vaccinate for stupid reasons! There are kids out there that happen to be getting measles and numerous other deadly things cause their parents are paying attention to these stupid people concerning kids getting autism from vaccinations.
I was relayed through my son s nurse that this only accocioation with autism and vaccines is cause autism actually shows around the time in the first vaccinations of kids. I don t determine that is really true, but that may be what she had said and my son doesn t have autism! Mainly cause autism isn t inside my family line. Please correct me if I am wrong, cause I am not actually a pro on this and I just hear from how many other s identify, though I never believed people that told me not to ever vaccinate my son.
Katrina, you said I was informed by my sons nurse that this only accocioation with autism and vaccines is cause autism actually shows concerning the time with the first vaccinations of youngsters. I dont determine that is really true. and also you said Please correct me if I am wrong, cause I am not actually a pro on this and I just hear from what others figure out, I think that it can be brave people to admit that you will not be sure and so are just making the work of just what the nurse stated. I think it can be a shame that others are not able to admit for this as well. I wonder why it really is that you never believed people that told me to never vaccinate my son and decide to just go for your vaccination with no question or research? Your son mightn't have autism that is certainly correct. But this is really a quote from an aquaintence of mine and it's very accurate the other to consider when vaccinating tests and studies on LONG TERM health effects were not done/established, however it is what evidence is pointing to. Osteoporosis, Fibromyalgia Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis, Lupus, Parkinson s, ALS Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Autism Spectrum Disorder, all manifestations from the same vaccine derived heavy metal-virus-mycoplasma-excipie
2015 download sun one studio 4 update 1 mobile edition